Cross posted with permission from Millard Fillmore’s Bathtub.

This may be the #1 hoax site on the web:  Martinlutherking.org. Certainly it is a site dangerous for children, because it cleverly purports to be an accurate history site, while selling voodoo history and racism.

A racist group bought the domain name (note the “.org” suffix), and they’ve managed to keep it.  The site features a drawing of Martin Luther King, Jr., on the first page.  The racist elements are subtle enough that unwary students and teachers may not recognize it for the hoax site it is.

It is both racist and hoax:  Note the link to a racist argument on “Why the Martin Luther King, Jr., holiday should be repealed;”  note the link to a hoax page, “Black invention myths.”

Students, nothing on that site should be trusted. Teachers, warn students away from the site.  You may want to use that site as a model of what a bad site looks like, and the importance of weighing the credibility of any site found on the web.

Why do I even mention the racist, hoax site? Because it comes upi #3 on Google searches for “Martin Luther King.”  Clearly a lot of people are being hoodwinked into going to that site.  I’ve seen papers by high school students citing the site, with teachers unaware of the site’s ignoble provenance.

Update: The site is owned by Stormfront, a white supremicist organization.

Here are a few good sites on the Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.; you can help things by clicking on each one of these sites, and by copying this list with links and posting it on your blog:

• Nobel Foundation site, biography of Dr. King for receiving the Nobel Prize for Peace
• King’s Nobel Prize Lecture
• Martin Luther King, Jr., Research and Education Institute (King Institute) at Stanford University
• Lesson plans from the King Institute, on the Montgomery Bus Boycott, Letter from Birmingham Jail, and more
• The King Center site; photo and video archive at the King Center
• Tribute, resources and links from the B. Davis Schwartz Memorial Library at the C. W. Post Campus, Long Island University
• Martin Luther King, Jr., National Historic Site (U.S. National Park Service)

Oh, gee, we’re running late:  The National History Day competition live webcast is this morning.  Go here: http://www.history.com/classroom/nhd/

And watch this, if you’re too late for the webcast.

This is a rerun of a post from Millard Fillmore’s Bathtub, originally posted in 2006 – with explicit permission of the author.  For Ms. Luna.

In a classroom discussion of “how do we know what we know” about history, another student brought up the allegations that the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) faked the manned Moon landings. That makes about a dozen times this year a kid has mentioned this claim (who thinks to start counting these things?). The kid was pretty unshakable in his convictions — after all, he said, how can a flag wave in a vacuum?

Astronaut from Apollo 14, on the Moon with U.S. flag - NASA photo via Wikimedia

I usually mention a couple of things that the fake claimers leave out — that dozens, if not hundreds, of amateur astronomers tracked the astronauts on their way to the Moon, that many people intercepted the radio transmissions from the Moon, that one mission retrieved debris from an earlier unmanned landing, etc. Younger students who lack experience in serious critical thinking have difficulty with these concepts. They also lack the historic background — the last manned Moon landing occurred when their parents were kids, perhaps. They didn’t grow up with NASA launches on television, and the whole world holding its breath to see what wonders would be found in space.

Phil Plait runs a fine blog called Bad Astronomy. Five years ago he got fed up with the Fox Television program claiming the Moon landings were hoaxes, and he made a significant reply that should be in some hall of fame for debunking hoaxes. Since the claim that the Moon landings were hoaxes is, itself, a hoax, I have titled this “Debunking the Moon landing hoax hoax.”

In any case, if you’re wondering about whether the Moon landings were hoaxes, you need to see Phil Plait’s post. Phil writes:

From the very first moment to the very last, the program is loaded with bad thinking, ridiculous suppositions and utterly wrong science. I was able to get a copy of the show in advance, and although I was expecting it to be bad, I was still surprised and how awful it was. I took four pages of notes. I won’t subject you to all of that here; it would take hours to write. I’ll only go over some of the major points of the show, and explain briefly why they are wrong.

Also, consider these chunks of evidence, which Phil does not mention so far as I know:

First, the first Moon landing left a mirror on the surface, off of which Earth-bound astronomers may bounce laser transmissions in order to measure exactly the distance from the Earth to the Moon. The American Institute of Physics has radio stories about the research results. Those who claim the landings were hoaxes have never been able to explain this mirror to my satisfaction — ask them how it got there if it wasn’t delivered by Apollo astronauts.

Second, Apollo 12 astronauts retrieved parts of the unmanned lunar probe Surveyor 3, which had landed on the Moon in 1967. That would be impractical to fake. It’s possible, I suppose, that someone could have conceived of the hoax a decade before it was necessary, and made a duplicate probe — but it defies all logic and history to claim that NASA undertook Surveyor 3 solely to provide physical evidence to claim a lunar landing that didn’t happen. A simpler explanation is that the Apollo 12 astronauts really landed and really retrieved the parts from Surveyor 3. A side note: My recollection is that a mold was found inside a camera recovered, indicating that molds can survive trips through the vacuum of space, and the temperature extremes for at least three years on the Moon. I’m not sure a hoax inventor could have conceived of that little bit — it’s too fantastic, and as Twain noted, in fiction one must stick to the possibilities.

NASA itself has a fine article debunking the hoax claims.

Jim Scotti’s site refutes the claims of hoax.

Photo above from Apollo 14, Alan Shepard’s “golf shot” trip.

Questions to answer about the Treaty of Versailles, Great Depression, New Deal, Rise of Fascism, Rise of Communism.

1. Describe Wilson’s 14 Points.
2. What happened to the League of Nations?
3. What did the French hope to achieve with the Treaty of Versailles?
4. Describe inflation in Germany, after World War I.
5. What does the book describe as causes of the Great Depression?
6. What happened to democratic states in Europe, after World War I?
7. Describe the effects of the Great Depression in
   A.    Germany
   B.    France
   C.    Britain
   D.    United States
8. What was John Maynard Keynes’s great idea in economics?
9. Adolf Hitler achieved power in what year?  Why did Germany support him?
10. Who ran in the U.S. presidential election in 1932?  Who won?
11. Describe the New Deal, in detail.
12. What was meant by the term “alphabet soup” when applied to Franklin Roosevelt’s programs?
13. Make the chart asked in question 7, in the assessment on page 756, on the causes of the Great Depression.
14. What is “fascism?”  Give examples.
15. Identify Benito Mussolini, Francisco Franco, and Adolf Hitler.
16. If you call someone a “brown shirt,” or a “black shirt,” why might they take offense?
17. Describe Lenin’s New Economic Policy.
18. When did Lenin die, and who led the Soviet Union after him?
19. What is a “five-year plan?”
20. Look at the Picasso painting shown on page 764.  What does it represent?  How big is it?

We’re talking about the sinking of the Lusitania, and the role that incident played in getting the U.S. into World War I.  The text book doesn’t do justice to all the implications.

Enlistment poster, after the sinking of the Lusitania

94 years ago,  the German submarine U-20 sank the Lusitania, champion of the Cunard Line, on May 7, 1915.

World War I appears to have been a heyday for propaganda posters.  Google up “Lusitania +poster” and you can find a wealth of recruiting posters and just plain propaganda posters.  If only we had the time, there are a couple of lesson plans waiting in that search.

Note:  Details on the poster: Artist, Fred Spear, 1915; “Enlist,” published by Sackett & Wilhelms Corp.  Incidentally, this poster was pubished in Boston, in 1915 — two years before the U.S. entered the war; did this poster have much propaganda effect, do you think?

Other resources:

• All Lusitania, all the time:  Lusitania blog

Borrowed, mostly, with permission from Millard Fillmore’s Bathtub.

Best, wisest and most cynical cartoon of the week, on the cover of the current North American edition of The Economist:

Cover, The Economist, North American edition, April 25-May 1, 2009; illustration by Jon Berkeley

For a week at least, you can get the story behind the cover for free, here.

THE rays are diffuse, but the specks of light are unmistakable. Share prices are up sharply. Even after slipping early this week, two-thirds of the 42 stockmarkets that The Economist tracks have risen in the past six weeks by more than 20%. Different economic indicators from different parts of the world have brightened. China’s economy is picking up. The slump in global manufacturing seems to be easing. Property markets in America and Britain are showing signs of life, as mortgage rates fall and homes become more affordable. Confidence is growing. A widely tracked index of investor sentiment in Germany has turned positive for the first time in almost two years.

*  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *

But, welcome as it is, optimism contains two traps, one obvious, the other more subtle. The obvious trap is that confidence proves misplaced—that the glimmers of hope are misinterpreted as the beginnings of a strong recovery when all they really show is that the rate of decline is slowing. The subtler trap, particularly for politicians, is that confidence and better news create ruinous complacency. Optimism is one thing, but hubris that the world economy is returning to normal could hinder recovery and block policies to protect against a further plunge into the depths.

The cover almost says it all, doesn’t it?  Week in and week out, The Economist has great covers, a phase of newsstand-oriented journalism that I hope never goes away, regardless the medium.

Borrowed in the entirety, with permission, from Millard Fillmore’s Bathtub.

The FDR Library in Hyde Park has an exhibit on FDR’s legendary First 100 Days.  Accompanying the exhibit is a flyer, available on-line in .pdf, that offers a very quick overview of what every student of of history should know. (See the cover of the flyer on the right.

Cover of the .pdf flyer on the FDR Libraray’s exhibit on the First 100 Days

A 24-page guide to the exhibit is also available, with even more details.  Go look at the document — download it, or print out a copy.  This is great material, rich with graphics that will help you remember key points, and solid enrichment to make better AP essays.

Resources:

• New Deal Network, resources for classrooms
• Prof. Puzzler on the New Deal (interactive set of questions)
• Franklin and Eleanor Roosevelt Institute
• List of First 100 Days legislation
• Home of Franklin Roosevelt (National Park Service site)

So, you’re studying hard for that test on the Industrial Revolution tomorrow, and the page turning is getting to you.  You’re yawning.  Why can’t Mr. Darrell put all this stuff on the blog in an interesting fashion?

Fortunately for you, someone has already done that.

Well, not everything.  But the Ballenas Library’s entry on the Industrial Revolution, with links all over the place, is a fun place to start.

Warning 1:  It doesn’t cover everything we have on our test.

Warning 2:  It covers a lot of stuff you may find interesting that will lead you to spend time studying things you didn’t ever find interesting before.

This chronology is more complete than what our texts have, and easily readable:  Frank Smitha’s site, Macrohistory and World Report, “The French Revolution.”

Some of the links to sidebars, images and other stories are good, too.  Go check it out.  Great review for the test.

Did Marie Antoinette actually say, “Let them eat cake?“

Resources:

• French Revolution resources, site of the Falcon Library, Foothill High School, Pleasanton, California
• Marie Antoinette biography, on PBS — site to accompany the film

Declaration of Independence?  U.S. Constitution?  In a world history class?

Original rough draft of the Declaration of Independence written out in longhand by Thomas Jefferson, featuring "emendations" by Benjamin Franklin and John Adams - Library of Congress Manuscripts Division

Most world history texts don’t cover the issue, but Texas insists on testing sophomores (10th grade) on the documents.

Both documents provide a foundation for analysis of events following, through the 19th and 20th centuries.

Where is the student of world history to find them?

Here:

Declaration of Independence

• History, images and transcript, at the National Archives
• Library of Congress resources
• Text at USHistory.org
• Text at the Yale Law School’s Avalon Project
• Historical documents (including the Declaration) at the U.S. House of Representatives Education site
• Visit the Declaration and the Constitution, at the National Archives in Washington, D.C.

Constitution of the United States of America

• History, images and transcript, at the National Archives
• Bill of Rights at the National Archives
• Text at Cornell University Law School’s Legal Information Institute (LII)
• Historical documents (including the Constitution and Bill of Rights) at the U.S. House of Representatives Education site
• Constitution in two columns with explanation in modern English, from the U.S. Senate website
• Amendments to the Constitution proposed, but not ratified
• Annotated Constitution, from Findlaw.com
• Constitution in several different formats, from U.S. Constitution Online

Rotunda of the National Archives in Washington, D.C., where the Declaration and Constitution are kept on display - National Archives photo